How do Qwen3.7 Max and MiniMax-M3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.7 Max and MiniMax-M3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs MiniMax-M3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.7 Max or MiniMax-M3?

AskClash compares Qwen3.7 Max and MiniMax-M3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.7 Max vs MiniMax-M3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.7 Max model page MiniMax-M3 model page

Rank #12 vs #17AskClash overall scores 70.7 vs 59.4.

Pricing $2.50/$7.50 vs $0.30/$1.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightAlibaba vs MiniMax.

Qwen3.7 Max vs MiniMax-M3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.7 Max	MiniMax-M3
Overall Score	70.7	59.4
Leaderboard Rank	#12	#17
RWT	7.5	8.5
HLE	41.4	37.1
GPQA	92.4	92.9
IFEval	94.3	82.9
SWE-bench	80.4	80.5
SWE-Pro	—	59.0
Terminal-Bench	69.7	66.0
OSWorld	—	70.1
MCP Atlas	76.4	74.2
Finance Agent	48.4	48.3
MMMU-Pro	—	78.1
Tau2	94.7	88.9
MRCR	90.4	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.50	$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$7.50	$1.20
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	13

Qwen3.7 Max vs MiniMax-M3 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.7 Max leads 7 and MiniMax-M3 leads 3 of 10 shared benchmarks. MiniMax-M3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.7 MaxMiniMax-M3

Overall

70.7Qwen3.7 Max

59.4MiniMax-M3

RWT

7.5Qwen3.7 Max

8.5MiniMax-M3

HLE

41.4Qwen3.7 Max

37.1MiniMax-M3

GPQA

92.4Qwen3.7 Max

92.9MiniMax-M3

IFEval

94.3Qwen3.7 Max

82.9MiniMax-M3

SWE-bench

80.4Qwen3.7 Max

80.5MiniMax-M3

Terminal-Bench

69.7Qwen3.7 Max

66.0MiniMax-M3

MCP Atlas

76.4Qwen3.7 Max

74.2MiniMax-M3

Finance Agent

48.4Qwen3.7 Max

48.3MiniMax-M3

Tau2

94.7Qwen3.7 Max

88.9MiniMax-M3

Qwen3.7 Max

Input$2.50

Output$7.50

Workload$4.00

Context1M

MiniMax-M3

Input$0.30

Output$1.20

Workload$0.54

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.7 Max and MiniMax-M3 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.7 Max and MiniMax-M3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Max GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax-M3 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Max Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax-M3 Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Grok 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.