How do Qwen3.8 27B and GLM-5.3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 27B and GLM-5.3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM-5.3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.8 27B or GLM-5.3?

AskClash compares Qwen3.8 27B and GLM-5.3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM-5.3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 27B model page GLM-5.3 model page

Rank #17 vs #20AskClash overall scores 57.0 vs 54.8.

Pricing $0.45/$3.20 vs $1.40/$4.40Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Z.AI.

Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM-5.3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 27B	GLM-5.3
Overall Score	57.0	54.8
Leaderboard Rank	#17	#20
ACB	56.4	62.2
RWT	—	8.5
HLE	30.8	62.5
GPQA	89.2	—
IFEval	79.5	—
SWE-Pro	61.7	—
Terminal-Bench	73.0	88.2
DeepSWE	42.2	66.9
OSWorld	84.3	—
CharXiv	90.2	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.45	$1.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$3.20	$4.40
Context Window	262K	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	5

Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM-5.3 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 27B leads 1 and GLM-5.3 leads 4 of 5 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 27BGLM-5.3

Overall

57.0Qwen3.8 27B

54.8GLM-5.3

ACB

56.4Qwen3.8 27B

62.2GLM-5.3

HLE

30.8Qwen3.8 27B

62.5GLM-5.3

Terminal-Bench

73.0Qwen3.8 27B

88.2GLM-5.3

DeepSWE

42.2Qwen3.8 27B

66.9GLM-5.3

Qwen3.8 27B

Input$0.45

Output$3.20

Workload$1.09

Context262K

GLM-5.3

Input$1.40

Output$4.40

Workload$2.28

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 27B and GLM-5.3 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 27B and GLM-5.3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 27B Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 27B Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3 Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 27B Grok 4.6 vs GLM-5.3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27B GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 27B Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.