LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Claude Sonnet 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Flash Next model pageClaude Sonnet 5 model page
Rank #14 vs #19AskClash overall scores 60.5 vs 57.7.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Anthropic.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Sonnet 5
Overall Score60.557.7
Leaderboard Rank#14#19
ACB66.560.8
RWT—8.5
HLE35.957.4
GPQA91.791.1
IFEval81.3—
SWE-bench—85.2
SWE-Pro62.563.2
Terminal-Bench86.180.4
DeepSWE58.753.8
GDPval-AA1743.01618.0
OSWorld—81.2
CharXiv90.688.3
MMMU-Pro—77.3
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.16$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.47$15.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1012

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Claude Sonnet 5 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 7 and Claude Sonnet 5 leads 2 of 9 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Sonnet 5
Overall
60.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
57.7Claude Sonnet 5
ACB
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
60.8Claude Sonnet 5
HLE
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
57.4Claude Sonnet 5
GPQA
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
91.1Claude Sonnet 5
SWE-Pro
62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
63.2Claude Sonnet 5
Terminal-Bench
86.1Qwen3.8 Flash Next
80.4Claude Sonnet 5
DeepSWE
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
53.8Claude Sonnet 5
GDPval-AA
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
1618.0Claude Sonnet 5
CharXiv
90.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
88.3Claude Sonnet 5
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Claude Sonnet 5
Input$3.00
Output$15.0
Workload$6.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Claude Sonnet 5 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Claude Sonnet 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGPT-6 Astra vs Claude Sonnet 5GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.