Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs GPT-5.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs GPT-5.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Flash Next ranks higher (#66 vs #81) and wins 5 of 9 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.8 Flash Next costs less ($0.16/$0.47 vs $5.00/$30.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #66 vs #81AskClash overall scores 56.5 vs 53.7.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $5.00/$30.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs OpenAI.
Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs GPT-5.5 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 Flash Next | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 56.5 | 53.7 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #66 | #81 |
| ACB | 66.5 | 62.0 |
| RWT | — | 8.0 |
| HLE | 35.9 | 52.2 |
| GPQA | 91.7 | 93.6 |
| IFEval | 81.3 | 75.9 |
| SWE-Pro | 62.5 | 58.6 |
| Terminal-Bench | 25.2 | 14.7 |
| DeepSWE | 58.7 | 67.0 |
| GDPval-AA | 1743.0 | 1349.6 |
| OSWorld | — | 78.7 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 75.3 |
| Finance Agent | — | 51.8 |
| CharXiv | 90.6 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 79.8 | 81.2 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | — | 85.0 |
| Tau2 | — | 98.0 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.16 | $5.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.47 | $30.0 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 12 | 14 |
Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs GPT-5.5 head-to-head charts
Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 6 and GPT-5.5 leads 4 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Qwen3.8 Flash NextGPT-5.5
Overall
ACB
HLE
GPQA
IFEval
SWE-Pro
Terminal-Bench
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
MMMU-Pro
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
GPT-5.5
Input$5.00
Output$30.0
Workload$11
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and GPT-5.5 comparisons
Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and GPT-5.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.