LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Grok 4.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Grok 4.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Qwen3.8 Flash Next ranks higher (#26 vs #34); Grok 4.5 wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.8 Flash Next costs less ($0.16/$0.47 vs $2.00/$6.00 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Flash Next model pageGrok 4.5 model page
Rank #26 vs #34AskClash overall scores 57.3 vs 52.4.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs xAI.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Grok 4.5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.5
Overall Score57.352.4
Leaderboard Rank#26#34
ACB66.557.6
RWT—9.0
Coding Agent Index—76.4
HLE35.940.3
GPQA91.793.1
IFEval81.3—
SWE-Pro62.564.7
SWE-Atlas—83.9
Terminal-Bench25.210.6
DeepSWE58.7—
GDPval-AA1743.01542.8
Finance Agent—48.3
CharXiv90.6—
MMMU-Pro79.880.4
ARC-AGI 2—52.6
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.16$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.47$6.00
Context Window1M500K
Benchmarks Published1214

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Grok 4.5 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 4 and Grok 4.5 leads 4 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.5
Overall
57.3Qwen3.8 Flash Next
52.4Grok 4.5
ACB
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
57.6Grok 4.5
HLE
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
40.3Grok 4.5
GPQA
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
93.1Grok 4.5
SWE-Pro
62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
64.7Grok 4.5
Terminal-Bench
25.2Qwen3.8 Flash Next
10.6Grok 4.5
GDPval-AA
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
1542.8Grok 4.5
MMMU-Pro
79.8Qwen3.8 Flash Next
80.4Grok 4.5
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Grok 4.5
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context500K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Grok 4.5 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Grok 4.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.