LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Kimi K2.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Kimi K2.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Flash Next model pageKimi K2.7 model page
Rank #19 vs #30AskClash overall scores 57.6 vs 43.1.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $0.95/$4.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Moonshot AI.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Kimi K2.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Flash NextKimi K2.7
Overall Score57.643.1
Leaderboard Rank#19#30
ACB66.543.0
RWT—7.5
HLE35.954.0
GPQA91.790.5
IFEval81.3—
SWE-bench—80.2
SWE-Pro62.558.6
Terminal-Bench—66.7
DeepSWE58.730.5
GDPval-AA1743.0—
OSWorld—73.1
MCP Atlas—76.0
Finance Agent—44.9
CharXiv90.680.4
MMMU-Pro—79.4
Tau2—90.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.16$0.95
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.47$4.00
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published914

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Kimi K2.7 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 6 and Kimi K2.7 leads 1 of 7 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextKimi K2.7
Overall
57.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
43.1Kimi K2.7
ACB
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
43.0Kimi K2.7
HLE
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
54.0Kimi K2.7
GPQA
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
90.5Kimi K2.7
SWE-Pro
62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
58.6Kimi K2.7
DeepSWE
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
30.5Kimi K2.7
CharXiv
90.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
80.4Kimi K2.7
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Kimi K2.7
Input$0.95
Output$4.00
Workload$1.75
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Kimi K2.7 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Kimi K2.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGLM-5.3 vs Kimi K2.7Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.