Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max or Claude Haiku 5.5?

Verdict: Qwen3.8 Max ranks higher (#10 vs #16) and wins 4 of 5 shared benchmarks; Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $2.00/$6.00 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Haiku 5.5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Haiku 5.5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Haiku 5.5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Haiku 5.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Haiku 5.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Qwen3.8 Max ranks higher (#10 vs #16) and wins 4 of 5 shared benchmarks; Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $2.00/$6.00 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 Max model page Claude Haiku 5.5 model page

Rank #10 vs #16AskClash overall scores 65.5 vs 60.0.

Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0.10/$0.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Anthropic.

Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Haiku 5.5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 Max	Claude Haiku 5.5
Overall Score	65.5	60.0
Leaderboard Rank	#10	#16
ACB	69.3	63.5
Coding Agent Index	43.3	—
HLE	43.6	57.4
GPQA	92.6	—
IFEval	82.8	—
SWE-Pro	67.7	64.8
SWE-Atlas	66.3	—
Terminal-Bench	38.9	32.8
DeepSWE	69.3	—
GDPval-AA	1671.4	1620.0
OSWorld	86.1	—
Finance Agent	50.6	—
CharXiv	88.4	—
MMMU-Pro	82.7	—
MRCR	92.9	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$0.10
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$6.00	$0.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	15	8

Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Haiku 5.5 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 1 of 6 shared benchmarks. Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall

65.5Qwen3.8 Max

60.0Claude Haiku 5.5

ACB

69.3Qwen3.8 Max

63.5Claude Haiku 5.5

HLE

43.6Qwen3.8 Max

57.4Claude Haiku 5.5

SWE-Pro

67.7Qwen3.8 Max

64.8Claude Haiku 5.5

Terminal-Bench

38.9Qwen3.8 Max

32.8Claude Haiku 5.5

GDPval-AA

1671.4Qwen3.8 Max

1620.0Claude Haiku 5.5

Qwen3.8 Max

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

Claude Haiku 5.5

Input$0.10

Output$0.50

Workload$0.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Haiku 5.5 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Haiku 5.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.