LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 4.8: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 4.8 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Max model pageClaude Opus 4.8 model page
Rank #5 vs #6AskClash overall scores 75.8 vs 75.6.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $5.00/$25.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Anthropic.

Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 MaxClaude Opus 4.8
Overall Score75.875.6
Leaderboard Rank#5#6
RWT—9.0
Coding Agent Index—72.5
HLE43.657.9
GPQA92.693.6
IFEval82.862.2
SWE-bench—88.6
SWE-Pro67.769.2
SWE-Atlas—82.5
Terminal-Bench86.674.6
DeepSWE56.659.0
OSWorld86.183.4
MCP Atlas—82.2
Finance Agent—53.9
CharXiv88.489.9
MMMU-Pro82.3—
ARC-AGI 2—72.1
Tau2—94.4
MRCR92.9—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$5.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$25.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1118

Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 4.8 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 4 and Claude Opus 4.8 leads 5 of 9 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Opus 4.8
Overall
75.8Qwen3.8 Max
75.6Claude Opus 4.8
HLE
43.6Qwen3.8 Max
57.9Claude Opus 4.8
GPQA
92.6Qwen3.8 Max
93.6Claude Opus 4.8
IFEval
82.8Qwen3.8 Max
62.2Claude Opus 4.8
SWE-Pro
67.7Qwen3.8 Max
69.2Claude Opus 4.8
Terminal-Bench
86.6Qwen3.8 Max
74.6Claude Opus 4.8
DeepSWE
56.6Qwen3.8 Max
59.0Claude Opus 4.8
OSWorld
86.1Qwen3.8 Max
83.4Claude Opus 4.8
CharXiv
88.4Qwen3.8 Max
89.9Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen3.8 Max
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
Claude Opus 4.8
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Opus 4.8 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Opus 4.8 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 MaxGPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.8Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 MaxKimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-5.5Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.