How do Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Sonnet 5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Sonnet 5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max or Claude Sonnet 5?

AskClash compares Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Sonnet 5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 Max model page Claude Sonnet 5 model page

Rank #5 vs #10AskClash overall scores 75.8 vs 71.6.

Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Anthropic.

Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 Max	Claude Sonnet 5
Overall Score	75.8	71.6
Leaderboard Rank	#5	#10
RWT	—	8.5
HLE	43.6	57.4
GPQA	92.6	91.1
IFEval	82.8	—
SWE-bench	—	85.2
SWE-Pro	67.7	63.2
Terminal-Bench	86.6	80.4
DeepSWE	56.6	53.8
OSWorld	86.1	81.2
CharXiv	88.4	88.3
MMMU-Pro	82.3	77.3
MRCR	92.9	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$6.00	$15.0
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	12

Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 8 and Claude Sonnet 5 leads 1 of 9 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Sonnet 5

Overall

75.8Qwen3.8 Max

71.6Claude Sonnet 5

HLE

43.6Qwen3.8 Max

57.4Claude Sonnet 5

GPQA

92.6Qwen3.8 Max

91.1Claude Sonnet 5

SWE-Pro

67.7Qwen3.8 Max

63.2Claude Sonnet 5

Terminal-Bench

86.6Qwen3.8 Max

80.4Claude Sonnet 5

DeepSWE

56.6Qwen3.8 Max

53.8Claude Sonnet 5

OSWorld

86.1Qwen3.8 Max

81.2Claude Sonnet 5

CharXiv

88.4Qwen3.8 Max

88.3Claude Sonnet 5

MMMU-Pro

82.3Qwen3.8 Max

77.3Claude Sonnet 5

Qwen3.8 Max

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

Claude Sonnet 5

Input$3.00

Output$15.0

Workload$6.00

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Sonnet 5 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Sonnet 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max Kimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.