LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #6 vs #17AskClash overall scores 74.9 vs 60.5.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0.43/$0.87Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAlibaba vs DeepSeek.

Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 MaxDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Overall Score74.960.5
Leaderboard Rank#6#17
RWT7.0
HLE43.642.7
GPQA92.690.1
IFEval82.8
SWE-bench80.6
SWE-Pro67.755.4
Terminal-Bench86.687.9
DeepSWE56.662.7
OSWorld86.1
MCP Atlas73.6
Finance Agent50.6
CharXiv88.4
MMMU-Pro82.3
MRCR92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$0.43
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$0.87
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published129

Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 4 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads 2 of 6 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Overall
74.9Qwen3.8 Max
60.5DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
HLE
43.6Qwen3.8 Max
42.7DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPQA
92.6Qwen3.8 Max
90.1DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SWE-Pro
67.7Qwen3.8 Max
55.4DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Terminal-Bench
86.6Qwen3.8 Max
87.9DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSWE
56.6Qwen3.8 Max
62.7DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Qwen3.8 Max
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Input$0.43
Output$0.87
Workload$0.61
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.