How do Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max): benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max or DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)?

AskClash compares Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 Max model page DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) model page

Rank #13 vs #30AskClash overall scores 64.0 vs 41.0.

Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0.43/$0.87Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightAlibaba vs DeepSeek.

Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 Max	DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
Overall Score	64.0	41.0
Leaderboard Rank	#13	#30
RWT	—	7.0
HLE	43.6	37.7
GPQA	92.6	90.1
MATH-500	—	64.5
IFEval	82.8	—
SWE-bench	—	80.6
SWE-Pro	67.7	55.4
Terminal-Bench	86.6	67.9
DeepSWE	56.6	—
OSWorld	86.1	—
MCP Atlas	—	73.6
CharXiv	88.4	—
MMMU-Pro	82.3	—
Tau2	—	96.2
MRCR	92.9	83.5
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$0.43
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$6.00	$0.87
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	9

Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 6 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Overall

64.0Qwen3.8 Max

41.0DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

HLE

43.6Qwen3.8 Max

37.7DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

GPQA

92.6Qwen3.8 Max

90.1DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

SWE-Pro

67.7Qwen3.8 Max

55.4DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Terminal-Bench

86.6Qwen3.8 Max

67.9DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

MRCR

92.9Qwen3.8 Max

83.5DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Qwen3.8 Max

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Input$0.43

Output$0.87

Workload$0.61

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.