LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-5.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-5.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #5 vs #7AskClash overall scores 75.8 vs 72.8.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $5.00/$30.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs OpenAI.

Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-5.5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 MaxGPT-5.5
Overall Score75.872.8
Leaderboard Rank#5#7
RWT8.0
Coding Agent Index61.5
HLE43.652.2
GPQA92.693.6
IFEval82.8
SWE-Pro67.758.6
Terminal-Bench86.682.7
DeepSWE56.667.0
OSWorld86.178.7
MCP Atlas75.3
Finance Agent51.8
CharXiv88.4
MMMU-Pro82.381.2
ARC-AGI 285.0
Tau298.0
MRCR92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$5.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$30.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1114

Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-5.5 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 5 and GPT-5.5 leads 3 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxGPT-5.5
Overall
75.8Qwen3.8 Max
72.8GPT-5.5
HLE
43.6Qwen3.8 Max
52.2GPT-5.5
GPQA
92.6Qwen3.8 Max
93.6GPT-5.5
SWE-Pro
67.7Qwen3.8 Max
58.6GPT-5.5
Terminal-Bench
86.6Qwen3.8 Max
82.7GPT-5.5
DeepSWE
56.6Qwen3.8 Max
67.0GPT-5.5
OSWorld
86.1Qwen3.8 Max
78.7GPT-5.5
MMMU-Pro
82.3Qwen3.8 Max
81.2GPT-5.5
Qwen3.8 Max
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
GPT-5.5
Input$5.00
Output$30.0
Workload$11
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and GPT-5.5 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and GPT-5.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.