Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6.1 Terra: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6.1 Terra comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Max ranks higher (#29 vs #35); GPT-6.1 Terra wins 3 of 5 shared benchmarks; GPT-6.1 Terra costs less ($1.00/$5.00 vs $2.00/$6.00 per 1M tokens).
Rank #29 vs #35AskClash overall scores 63.6 vs 61.7.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $1.00/$5.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs OpenAI.
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6.1 Terra benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 Max | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 63.6 | 61.7 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #29 | #35 |
| ACB | 69.3 | 62.1 |
| HLE | 43.6 | 46.2 |
| GPQA | 92.6 | — |
| IFEval | 82.8 | — |
| SWE-Pro | 67.7 | — |
| SWE-Atlas | 66.3 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 38.9 | 55.6 |
| DeepSWE | 69.3 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1666.3 | 1467.6 |
| OSWorld | 86.1 | — |
| Finance Agent | 50.6 | — |
| CharXiv | 88.4 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 82.7 | 84.7 |
| MRCR | 92.9 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $6.00 | $5.00 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Benchmarks Published | 14 | 8 |
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6.1 Terra head-to-head charts
Qwen3.8 Max leads 3 and GPT-6.1 Terra leads 3 of 6 shared benchmarks. GPT-6.1 Terra is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Qwen3.8 MaxGPT-6.1 Terra
Overall
ACB
HLE
Terminal-Bench
GDPval-AA
MMMU-Pro
Qwen3.8 Max
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
GPT-6.1 Terra
Input$1.00
Output$5.00
Workload$2.00
Context1.05M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Qwen3.8 Max and GPT-6.1 Terra comparisons
Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and GPT-6.1 Terra stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 MaxKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.