How do Qwen3.8 Max and LongCat 2.0 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 Max and LongCat 2.0 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs LongCat 2.0: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max or LongCat 2.0?

AskClash compares Qwen3.8 Max and LongCat 2.0 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs LongCat 2.0 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 Max model page LongCat 2.0 model page

Rank #13 vs #22AskClash overall scores 64.0 vs 49.1.

Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0.75/$2.95Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Meituan.

Qwen3.8 Max vs LongCat 2.0 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 Max	LongCat 2.0
Overall Score	64.0	49.1
Leaderboard Rank	#13	#22
HLE	43.6	—
GPQA	92.6	88.9
IFEval	82.8	90.0
SWE-Pro	67.7	59.5
Terminal-Bench	86.6	70.8
DeepSWE	56.6	—
OSWorld	86.1	—
CharXiv	88.4	—
MMMU-Pro	82.3	—
Tau2	—	88.2
MRCR	92.9	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$0.75
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$6.00	$2.95
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	5

Qwen3.8 Max vs LongCat 2.0 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 4 and LongCat 2.0 leads 1 of 5 shared benchmarks. LongCat 2.0 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxLongCat 2.0

Overall

64.0Qwen3.8 Max

49.1LongCat 2.0

GPQA

92.6Qwen3.8 Max

88.9LongCat 2.0

IFEval

82.8Qwen3.8 Max

90.0LongCat 2.0

SWE-Pro

67.7Qwen3.8 Max

59.5LongCat 2.0

Terminal-Bench

86.6Qwen3.8 Max

70.8LongCat 2.0

Qwen3.8 Max

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

LongCat 2.0

Input$0.75

Output$2.95

Workload$1.34

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and LongCat 2.0 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and LongCat 2.0 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 5 vs LongCat 2.0 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Fable 5 vs LongCat 2.0 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-5.6 Sol vs LongCat 2.0 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max Kimi K3 vs LongCat 2.0 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 4.8 vs LongCat 2.0

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.