LLM Comparison

Sakana Fugu vs SWE-1.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Sakana Fugu vs SWE-1.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #8 vs #44AskClash overall scores 79.8 vs 28.8.
Pricing $5.00/$30.0 vs $0/$0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietarySakana AI vs Cognition.

Sakana Fugu vs SWE-1.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricSakana FuguSWE-1.7
Overall Score79.828.8
Leaderboard Rank#8#44
RWT9.0
HLE47.2
GPQA95.5
SWE-Pro59.0
Terminal-Bench80.281.5
LiveCodeBench92.9
CharXiv85.1
MRCR86.6
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$30.0$0
Context Window1M256K
Benchmark Cells71

More Sakana Fugu and SWE-1.7 comparisons

Explore how Sakana Fugu and SWE-1.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.