How do SWE-1.7 and Composer 2.5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both SWE-1.7 and Composer 2.5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

SWE-1.7 vs Composer 2.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: SWE-1.7 or Composer 2.5?

AskClash compares SWE-1.7 and Composer 2.5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side SWE-1.7 vs Composer 2.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard SWE-1.7 model page Composer 2.5 model page

Rank #30 vs #50AskClash overall scores 51.1 vs 32.3.

Pricing $0/$0 vs $0.50/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryCognition vs Cursor.

SWE-1.7 vs Composer 2.5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	SWE-1.7	Composer 2.5
Overall Score	51.1	32.3
Leaderboard Rank	#30	#50
ACB	—	53.2
RWT	8.5	8.5
Coding Agent Index	—	38.3
SWE-Pro	—	47.0
SWE-Atlas	—	72.0
Terminal-Bench	81.5	69.3
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0	$0.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0	$2.50
Context Window	256K	200K
Benchmarks Published	1	5

SWE-1.7 vs Composer 2.5 head-to-head charts

SWE-1.7 leads 2 and Composer 2.5 leads 0 of 3 shared benchmarks. SWE-1.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

SWE-1.7Composer 2.5

Overall

51.1SWE-1.7

32.3Composer 2.5

RWT

8.5SWE-1.7

8.5Composer 2.5

Terminal-Bench

81.5SWE-1.7

69.3Composer 2.5

SWE-1.7

Input$0

Output$0

Workload$0.00

Context256K

Composer 2.5

Input$0.50

Output$2.50

Workload$1.00

Context200K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More SWE-1.7 and Composer 2.5 comparisons

Explore how SWE-1.7 and Composer 2.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs SWE-1.7 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Fable 5 vs SWE-1.7 Claude Fable 5 vs Composer 2.5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs SWE-1.7 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Composer 2.5 Claude Opus 5 vs SWE-1.7 Claude Opus 5 vs Composer 2.5 Grok 4.6 vs SWE-1.7 Grok 4.6 vs Composer 2.5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.