ACB
64.6 score
Claude Fable 5 ranks #3 on the AskClash LLM leaderboard with an overall score of 78.2. It scores 77.2 on the Coding Agent Index, 95.5 on SWE-bench and 88.0 on Terminal-Bench. Compare Claude Fable 5 vs GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, open-weight, and frontier AI models using public benchmark scores, token pricing, context window, and access details.
AskClash combines public LLM benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.
Cached benchmark values can include HLE, GPQA, SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, ARC-AGI-2, Tau2, and model-specific coding or agent scores.
64.6 score
9.0 score
77.2 score
64.5 score
94.5 score
80.3 score
95.5 score
80.3 score
83.3 score
88.0 score
69.7 score
1932.5 score
85.0 score
56.3 score
93.5 score
89.3 score
89.2 score
89.2 score
Use these comparison links to evaluate Claude Fable 5 against nearby LLMs by benchmark score, price, context window, and provider.
Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, benchmark, pricing, or market context around this model.

Astra leads computer use, Argon leads legal and finance work, and Sol wins on price for coding agents. The post GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6.1 Sol vs Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1: Which Frontier Model Fits Which Job appeared first on MarkTechPost .
Jefferies said that significantly undercuts Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.1, priced at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4 and $20, respectively. Google is also offering a 95% discount on cached input tokens. P
Last cached leaderboard date: . This model page is generated from the AskClash LLM Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.