Which is better: GPT-6.1 Sol or Claude Fable 5?

Verdict: GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher (#8 vs #9) and wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks; GPT-6.1 Sol costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Fable 5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Fable 5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Fable 5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Fable 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Fable 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher (#8 vs #9) and wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks; GPT-6.1 Sol costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard GPT-6.1 Sol model page Claude Fable 5 model page

Rank #8 vs #9AskClash overall scores 69.3 vs 68.2.

Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $10.0/$50.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryOpenAI vs Anthropic.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Fable 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GPT-6.1 Sol	Claude Fable 5
Overall Score	69.3	68.2
Leaderboard Rank	#8	#9
ACB	69.9	64.6
RWT	—	9.0
Coding Agent Index	54.1	—
HLE	52.9	64.5
GPQA	95.0	94.5
IFEval	—	80.3
SWE-bench	—	95.5
SWE-Pro	—	80.3
SWE-Atlas	59.9	—
Terminal-Bench	56.1	42.4
DeepSWE	75.2	69.7
GDPval-AA	1575.1	1932.5
OSWorld	—	85.0
MCP Atlas	—	83.3
Finance Agent	61.8	—
CharXiv	—	93.5
MMMU-Pro	86.0	89.3
ARC-AGI 2	94.2	—
Tau2	—	89.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$10.0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$10.0	$50.0
Context Window	1.05M	1M+
Benchmarks Published	14	13

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Fable 5 head-to-head charts

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 5 and Claude Fable 5 leads 3 of 8 shared benchmarks. GPT-6.1 Sol is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5

Overall

69.3GPT-6.1 Sol

68.2Claude Fable 5

ACB

69.9GPT-6.1 Sol

64.6Claude Fable 5

HLE

52.9GPT-6.1 Sol

64.5Claude Fable 5

GPQA

95.0GPT-6.1 Sol

94.5Claude Fable 5

Terminal-Bench

56.1GPT-6.1 Sol

42.4Claude Fable 5

DeepSWE

75.2GPT-6.1 Sol

69.7Claude Fable 5

GDPval-AA

1575.1GPT-6.1 Sol

1932.5Claude Fable 5

MMMU-Pro

86.0GPT-6.1 Sol

89.3Claude Fable 5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Input$2.00

Output$10.0

Workload$4.00

Context1.05M

Claude Fable 5

Input$10.0

Output$50.0

Workload$20

Context1M+

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Fable 5 comparisons

Explore how GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Fable 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5 Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Fable 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.