LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#2 vs #23) and wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less ($0.30/$1.20 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5.1 model pageDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 model page
Rank #2 vs #23AskClash overall scores 78.0 vs 58.3.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.30/$1.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs DeepSeek.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Overall Score78.058.3
Leaderboard Rank#2#23
ACB79.2—
RWT9.0—
HLE65.042.6
GPQA93.790.9
SWE-Pro81.2—
Terminal-Bench52.0—
DeepSWE67.4—
GDPval-AA1853.01745.8
Finance Agent58.953.5
MMMU-Pro90.680.6
ARC-AGI 290.0—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$1.20
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published138

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5.1 leads 6 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Overall
78.0Claude Fable 5.1
58.3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
HLE
65.0Claude Fable 5.1
42.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA
93.7Claude Fable 5.1
90.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GDPval-AA
1853.0Claude Fable 5.1
1745.8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Finance Agent
58.9Claude Fable 5.1
53.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MMMU-Pro
90.6Claude Fable 5.1
80.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Claude Fable 5.1
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Input$0.30
Output$1.20
Workload$0.54
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemini 4 Argon vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.