LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#2 vs #57) and wins 7 of 7 shared benchmarks; Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs less ($0.30/$2.50 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5.1 model pageGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model page
Rank #2 vs #57AskClash overall scores 78.0 vs 33.2.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.30/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Google.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall Score78.033.2
Leaderboard Rank#2#57
ACB79.2—
RWT9.07.0
HLE65.018.8
GPQA93.783.8
SWE-Pro81.254.2
Terminal-Bench52.0—
DeepSWE67.4—
GDPval-AA1853.01140.0
OSWorld—74.0
Finance Agent58.947.4
MMMU-Pro90.679.0
ARC-AGI 290.0—
MRCR—72.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$2.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published139

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5.1 leads 8 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 0 of 8 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5.1Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall
78.0Claude Fable 5.1
33.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
RWT
9.0Claude Fable 5.1
7.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
HLE
65.0Claude Fable 5.1
18.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
GPQA
93.7Claude Fable 5.1
83.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
SWE-Pro
81.2Claude Fable 5.1
54.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
GDPval-AA
1853.0Claude Fable 5.1
1140.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Finance Agent
58.9Claude Fable 5.1
47.4Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
MMMU-Pro
90.6Claude Fable 5.1
79.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Claude Fable 5.1
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input$0.30
Output$2.50
Workload$0.80
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemini 4 Argon vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.