LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5.1 model pageGemini 3.7 Flash model page
Rank #1 vs #11AskClash overall scores 92.0 vs 68.9.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Google.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3.7 Flash
Overall Score92.068.9
Leaderboard Rank#1#11
ACB79.238.9
RWT9.0—
HLE65.053.6
GPQA93.794.5
SWE-Pro81.2—
Terminal-Bench91.485.8
DeepSWE67.465.3
GDPval-AA1853.01525.0
Finance Agent58.959.0
CharXiv—84.5
MMMU-Pro90.685.5
ARC-AGI 290.0—
MRCR—97.0
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$7.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1111

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5.1 leads 7 and Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 2 of 9 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5.1Gemini 3.7 Flash
Overall
92.0Claude Fable 5.1
68.9Gemini 3.7 Flash
ACB
79.2Claude Fable 5.1
38.9Gemini 3.7 Flash
HLE
65.0Claude Fable 5.1
53.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA
93.7Claude Fable 5.1
94.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench
91.4Claude Fable 5.1
85.8Gemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSWE
67.4Claude Fable 5.1
65.3Gemini 3.7 Flash
GDPval-AA
1853.0Claude Fable 5.1
1525.0Gemini 3.7 Flash
Finance Agent
58.9Claude Fable 5.1
59.0Gemini 3.7 Flash
MMMU-Pro
90.6Claude Fable 5.1
85.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
Claude Fable 5.1
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3GLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.