LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5.1 model pageKimi K2.7 model page
Rank #1 vs #30AskClash overall scores 92.0 vs 43.1.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.95/$4.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Moonshot AI.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1Kimi K2.7
Overall Score92.043.1
Leaderboard Rank#1#30
ACB79.243.0
RWT9.07.5
HLE65.054.0
GPQA93.790.5
SWE-bench—80.2
SWE-Pro81.258.6
Terminal-Bench91.466.7
DeepSWE67.430.5
GDPval-AA1853.0—
OSWorld—73.1
MCP Atlas—76.0
Finance Agent58.944.9
CharXiv—80.4
MMMU-Pro90.679.4
ARC-AGI 290.0—
Tau2—90.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$0.95
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$4.00
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published1114

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7 head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5.1 leads 10 and Kimi K2.7 leads 0 of 10 shared benchmarks. Kimi K2.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5.1Kimi K2.7
Overall
92.0Claude Fable 5.1
43.1Kimi K2.7
ACB
79.2Claude Fable 5.1
43.0Kimi K2.7
RWT
9.0Claude Fable 5.1
7.5Kimi K2.7
HLE
65.0Claude Fable 5.1
54.0Kimi K2.7
GPQA
93.7Claude Fable 5.1
90.5Kimi K2.7
SWE-Pro
81.2Claude Fable 5.1
58.6Kimi K2.7
Terminal-Bench
91.4Claude Fable 5.1
66.7Kimi K2.7
DeepSWE
67.4Claude Fable 5.1
30.5Kimi K2.7
Finance Agent
58.9Claude Fable 5.1
44.9Kimi K2.7
MMMU-Pro
90.6Claude Fable 5.1
79.4Kimi K2.7
Claude Fable 5.1
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M
Kimi K2.7
Input$0.95
Output$4.00
Workload$1.75
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6Grok 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K2.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.