LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #1 vs #7AskClash overall scores 92.0 vs 74.6.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Moonshot AI.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1Kimi K3
Overall Score92.074.6
Leaderboard Rank#1#7
ACB79.257.7
RWT9.08.0
HLE65.043.5
GPQA93.793.5
SWE-Pro81.2
Terminal-Bench91.488.3
DeepSWE67.468.5
GDPval-AA1853.01668.0
MCP Atlas84.2
Finance Agent58.954.4
CharXiv84.8
MMMU-Pro90.681.6
ARC-AGI 290.0
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$15.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1111

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5.1 leads 9 and Kimi K3 leads 1 of 10 shared benchmarks. Kimi K3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5.1Kimi K3
Overall
92.0Claude Fable 5.1
74.6Kimi K3
ACB
79.2Claude Fable 5.1
57.7Kimi K3
RWT
9.0Claude Fable 5.1
8.0Kimi K3
HLE
65.0Claude Fable 5.1
43.5Kimi K3
GPQA
93.7Claude Fable 5.1
93.5Kimi K3
Terminal-Bench
91.4Claude Fable 5.1
88.3Kimi K3
DeepSWE
67.4Claude Fable 5.1
68.5Kimi K3
GDPval-AA
1853.0Claude Fable 5.1
1668.0Kimi K3
Finance Agent
58.9Claude Fable 5.1
54.4Kimi K3
MMMU-Pro
90.6Claude Fable 5.1
81.6Kimi K3
Claude Fable 5.1
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M
Kimi K3
Input$3.00
Output$15.0
Workload$6.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5.1 and Kimi K3 comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and Kimi K3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.