Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Mistral Large 4: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs Mistral Large 4 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#3 vs #30) and wins 4 of 4 shared benchmarks; Mistral Large 4 costs less ($0.68/$2.09 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #3 vs #30AskClash overall scores 77.9 vs 52.5.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.68/$2.09Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs PendingAnthropic vs Mistral.
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Mistral Large 4 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 77.9 | 52.5 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #3 | #30 |
| ACB | 79.2 | — |
| RWT | 9.0 | — |
| Coding Agent Index | 62.2 | — |
| HLE | 65.0 | 35.0 |
| GPQA | 93.7 | — |
| SWE-Pro | 81.2 | — |
| SWE-Atlas | 64.8 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 52.0 | — |
| DeepSWE | 67.4 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1853.0 | 1423.9 |
| Finance Agent | 58.9 | 54.7 |
| MMMU-Pro | 90.6 | 76.4 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 90.0 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $0.68 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $50.0 | $2.09 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 15 | 7 |
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Mistral Large 4 head-to-head charts
Claude Fable 5.1 leads 5 and Mistral Large 4 leads 0 of 5 shared benchmarks. Mistral Large 4 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Fable 5.1Mistral Large 4
Overall
HLE
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
MMMU-Pro
Claude Fable 5.1
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M
Mistral Large 4
Input$0.68
Output$2.09
Workload$1.10
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Fable 5.1 and Mistral Large 4 comparisons
Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and Mistral Large 4 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5 vs Mistral Large 4Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5 vs Mistral Large 4Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Mistral Large 4Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Mistral Large 4Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol vs Mistral Large 4
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.