Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.6 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.6 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#2 vs #49) and wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.6 Plus costs less ($0.50/$3.00 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #2 vs #49AskClash overall scores 78.2 vs 36.6.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.50/$3.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.6 Plus benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 78.2 | 36.6 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #2 | #49 |
| ACB | 79.2 | — |
| RWT | 9.0 | — |
| Coding Agent Index | 62.2 | — |
| HLE | 65.0 | 28.8 |
| GPQA | 93.7 | 90.4 |
| IFEval | — | 94.3 |
| SWE-bench | — | 78.8 |
| SWE-Pro | 81.2 | — |
| SWE-Atlas | 64.8 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 52.0 | — |
| DeepSWE | 67.4 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1853.0 | 993.0 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 48.2 |
| Finance Agent | 58.9 | 40.8 |
| CharXiv | — | 81.5 |
| MMMU-Pro | 90.6 | 78.8 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 90.0 | — |
| Tau2 | — | 97.7 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $0.50 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $50.0 | $3.00 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 15 | 9 |
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.6 Plus head-to-head charts
Claude Fable 5.1 leads 6 and Qwen3.6 Plus leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Fable 5.1Qwen3.6 Plus
Overall
HLE
GPQA
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
MMMU-Pro
Claude Fable 5.1
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M
Qwen3.6 Plus
Input$0.50
Output$3.00
Workload$1.10
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.6 Plus comparisons
Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.6 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.6 PlusClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.6 PlusClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.6 PlusClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.6 PlusClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.6 Plus
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.