LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5.1 model pageQwen3.8 Flash Next model page
Rank #1 vs #19AskClash overall scores 92.0 vs 57.6.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.16/$0.47Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall Score92.057.6
Leaderboard Rank#1#19
ACB79.266.5
RWT9.0—
HLE65.035.9
GPQA93.791.7
IFEval—81.3
SWE-Pro81.262.5
Terminal-Bench91.4—
DeepSWE67.458.7
GDPval-AA1853.01743.0
Finance Agent58.9—
CharXiv—90.6
MMMU-Pro90.6—
ARC-AGI 290.0—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$0.16
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$0.47
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published119

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5.1 leads 7 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 0 of 7 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall
92.0Claude Fable 5.1
57.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
ACB
79.2Claude Fable 5.1
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
HLE
65.0Claude Fable 5.1
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
GPQA
93.7Claude Fable 5.1
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
SWE-Pro
81.2Claude Fable 5.1
62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
DeepSWE
67.4Claude Fable 5.1
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
GDPval-AA
1853.0Claude Fable 5.1
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Claude Fable 5.1
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.