Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5.2 ranks higher (#1 vs #47) and wins 4 of 4 shared benchmarks; Gemini 3.1 Pro costs less ($2.00/$12.0 vs $8.00/$40.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #1 vs #47AskClash overall scores 81.6 vs 32.8.
Pricing $8.00/$40.0 vs $2.00/$12.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Google.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 81.6 | 32.8 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #1 | #47 |
| ACB | 91.4 | — |
| HLE | 74.2 | 51.4 |
| GPQA | — | 94.3 |
| SWE-bench | — | 80.6 |
| SWE-Pro | 93.0 | 54.2 |
| Terminal-Bench | 59.6 | — |
| DeepSWE | 74.3 | 11.7 |
| GDPval-AA | 1831.0 | 1317.0 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 69.2 |
| Finance Agent | — | 43.0 |
| CharXiv | — | 80.2 |
| MMMU-Pro | — | 83.9 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | — | 77.1 |
| Tau2 | — | 99.3 |
| MRCR | — | 84.9 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $8.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $40.0 | $12.0 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 10 |
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro head-to-head charts
Claude Fable 5.2 leads 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 0 of 5 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Fable 5.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
Overall
HLE
SWE-Pro
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
Claude Fable 5.2
Input$8.00
Output$40.0
Workload$16
Context1M
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$12.0
Workload$4.40
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Fable 5.2 and Gemini 3.1 Pro comparisons
Explore how Claude Fable 5.2 and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemini 4 Argon vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.