Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 27B: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 27B comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5.2 ranks higher (#1 vs #44) and wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.8 27B costs less ($0.45/$3.20 vs $8.00/$40.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #1 vs #44AskClash overall scores 81.6 vs 40.4.
Pricing $8.00/$40.0 vs $0.45/$3.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Alibaba.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 27B benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 81.6 | 40.4 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #1 | #44 |
| ACB | 91.4 | 56.4 |
| HLE | 74.2 | 30.8 |
| GPQA | — | 89.2 |
| IFEval | — | 79.5 |
| SWE-Pro | 93.0 | 61.7 |
| Terminal-Bench | 59.6 | — |
| DeepSWE | 74.3 | 42.2 |
| GDPval-AA | 1831.0 | 1426.7 |
| OSWorld | — | 84.3 |
| Finance Agent | — | 48.6 |
| CharXiv | — | 90.2 |
| MMMU-Pro | — | 76.3 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $8.00 | $0.45 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $40.0 | $3.20 |
| Context Window | 1M | 262K |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 12 |
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 27B head-to-head charts
Claude Fable 5.2 leads 6 and Qwen3.8 27B leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3.8 27B
Overall
ACB
HLE
SWE-Pro
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
Claude Fable 5.2
Input$8.00
Output$40.0
Workload$16
Context1M
Qwen3.8 27B
Input$0.45
Output$3.20
Workload$1.09
Context262K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Fable 5.2 and Qwen3.8 27B comparisons
Explore how Claude Fable 5.2 and Qwen3.8 27B stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 27B
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.