Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5 ranks higher (#5 vs #54) and wins 11 of 11 shared benchmarks; Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs less ($3.00/$15.0 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #5 vs #54AskClash overall scores 74.3 vs 31.9.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Anthropic.
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 74.3 | 31.9 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #5 | #54 |
| ACB | 64.6 | — |
| RWT | 9.0 | 6.0 |
| Coding Agent Index | 77.2 | — |
| HLE | 64.5 | 49.0 |
| GPQA | 94.5 | 89.9 |
| IFEval | 80.3 | 41.2 |
| SWE-bench | 95.5 | 80.2 |
| SWE-Pro | 80.3 | — |
| SWE-Atlas | 83.3 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 42.4 | — |
| DeepSWE | 69.7 | 29.9 |
| GDPval-AA | 1932.5 | — |
| OSWorld | 85.0 | — |
| Finance Agent | 56.3 | 51.0 |
| CharXiv | 93.5 | 77.4 |
| MMMU-Pro | 89.3 | 75.6 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 89.2 | 58.3 |
| Tau2 | 89.2 | 79.5 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $3.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $50.0 | $15.0 |
| Context Window | 1M+ | 200K |
| Benchmarks Published | 16 | 9 |
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 head-to-head charts
Claude Fable 5 leads 12 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads 0 of 12 shared benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 4.6
Overall
RWT
HLE
GPQA
IFEval
SWE-bench
DeepSWE
Finance Agent
CharXiv
MMMU-Pro
ARC-AGI 2
Tau2
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input$3.00
Output$15.0
Workload$6.00
Context200K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Fable 5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 comparisons
Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.