LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5 model pageDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 model page
Rank #2 vs #16AskClash overall scores 85.7 vs 56.1.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.14/$0.28Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs DeepSeek.

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Overall Score85.756.1
Leaderboard Rank#2#16
RWT9.0—
Coding Agent Index77.2—
HLE64.537.0
GPQA94.591.0
MATH-500—57.4
IFEval80.3—
SWE-bench95.579.0
SWE-Pro80.3—
SWE-Atlas83.3—
Terminal-Bench88.082.7
DeepSWE69.754.4
OSWorld85.0—
MCP Atlas—69.0
Finance Agent56.3—
CharXiv93.5—
MMMU-Pro92.7—
Tau289.2—
MRCR—78.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$0.14
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$0.28
Context Window1M+1M
Benchmarks Published179

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5 leads 6 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Overall
85.7Claude Fable 5
56.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
HLE
64.5Claude Fable 5
37.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPQA
94.5Claude Fable 5
91.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
SWE-bench
95.5Claude Fable 5
79.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Terminal-Bench
88.0Claude Fable 5
82.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
DeepSWE
69.7Claude Fable 5
54.4DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input$0.14
Output$0.28
Workload$0.20
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.