Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5 ranks higher (#9 vs #13); Gemini 4 Hydrogen wins 4 of 4 shared benchmarks; Gemini 4 Hydrogen costs less ($1.50/$7.50 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #9 vs #13AskClash overall scores 68.0 vs 62.8.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Google.
Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68.0 | 62.8 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #9 | #13 |
| ACB | 64.6 | 70.2 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 49.7 | 53.9 |
| AutomationBench-AA | 54.1 | 76.1 |
| RWT | 9.0 | — |
| HLE | 64.5 | — |
| GPQA | 94.5 | — |
| IFEval | 80.3 | — |
| SWE-bench | 95.5 | — |
| SWE-Pro | 80.3 | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 42.4 | 54.0 |
| DeepSWE | 69.7 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1932.5 | — |
| OSWorld | 85.0 | — |
| MCP Atlas | 83.3 | — |
| Finance Agent v2.1 | — | 65.1 |
| CharXiv | 93.5 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 89.3 | — |
| Tau2 | 89.2 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $1.50 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $50.0 | $7.50 |
| Context Window | 1M+ | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 13 | 5 |
Gemini 4 Hydrogen: its diagnostic ACB uses a review slice and sampled video frames.
Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen head-to-head charts
Claude Fable 5 leads 0 and Gemini 4 Hydrogen leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. Gemini 4 Hydrogen is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Fable 5Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Overall
ACB
AA Intelligence Index
AutomationBench-AA
Terminal-Bench 4.0
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 4 Hydrogen comparisons
Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 4 Hydrogen stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 HydrogenClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 HydrogenClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 HydrogenClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 HydrogenGemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Fable 5Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.