LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.1 Thinking: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.1 Thinking comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5 model pageGLM 5.1 Thinking model page
Rank #2 vs #25AskClash overall scores 92.5 vs 50.5.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0/$0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Zhipu AI.

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.1 Thinking benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5GLM 5.1 Thinking
Overall Score92.550.5
Leaderboard Rank#2#25
RWT9.0—
Coding Agent Index77.236.1
HLE64.552.3
GPQA94.586.2
IFEval80.3—
SWE-bench95.5—
SWE-Pro80.358.4
SWE-Atlas83.3—
Terminal-Bench88.063.5
DeepSWE69.7—
OSWorld85.0—
MCP Atlas—71.8
Finance Agent56.344.8
CharXiv93.5—
MMMU-Pro92.7—
Tau289.297.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$0
Context Window1M+203K
Benchmarks Published179

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.1 Thinking head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5 leads 7 and GLM 5.1 Thinking leads 1 of 8 shared benchmarks. GLM 5.1 Thinking is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5GLM 5.1 Thinking
Overall
92.5Claude Fable 5
50.5GLM 5.1 Thinking
Coding Agent Index
77.2Claude Fable 5
36.1GLM 5.1 Thinking
HLE
64.5Claude Fable 5
52.3GLM 5.1 Thinking
GPQA
94.5Claude Fable 5
86.2GLM 5.1 Thinking
SWE-Pro
80.3Claude Fable 5
58.4GLM 5.1 Thinking
Terminal-Bench
88.0Claude Fable 5
63.5GLM 5.1 Thinking
Finance Agent
56.3Claude Fable 5
44.8GLM 5.1 Thinking
Tau2
89.2Claude Fable 5
97.7GLM 5.1 Thinking
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
GLM 5.1 Thinking
Input$0
Output$0
Workload$0.00
Context203K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5 and GLM 5.1 Thinking comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5 and GLM 5.1 Thinking stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 5.1 ThinkingClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM 5.1 ThinkingClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.1 ThinkingClaude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs GLM 5.1 ThinkingClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.1 Thinking

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.