LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #1 vs #18AskClash overall scores 91.9 vs 58.7.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.12/$0.43Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Tencent.

Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5Hy3
Overall Score91.958.7
Leaderboard Rank#1#18
RWT9.08.0
Coding Agent Index77.2
HLE64.553.2
GPQA94.590.4
IFEval80.3
SWE-bench95.578.0
SWE-Pro80.357.9
SWE-Atlas83.3
Terminal-Bench88.071.7
DeepSWE69.7
OSWorld85.0
MCP Atlas79.1
Finance Agent56.3
CharXiv93.5
MMMU-Pro92.7
Tau289.292.7
MRCR75.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$0.12
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$0.43
Context Window1M+256K
Benchmarks Published169

Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5 leads 7 and Hy3 leads 1 of 8 shared benchmarks. Hy3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5Hy3
Overall
91.9Claude Fable 5
58.7Hy3
RWT
9.0Claude Fable 5
8.0Hy3
HLE
64.5Claude Fable 5
53.2Hy3
GPQA
94.5Claude Fable 5
90.4Hy3
SWE-bench
95.5Claude Fable 5
78.0Hy3
SWE-Pro
80.3Claude Fable 5
57.9Hy3
Terminal-Bench
88.0Claude Fable 5
71.7Hy3
Tau2
89.2Claude Fable 5
92.7Hy3
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
Hy3
Input$0.12
Output$0.43
Workload$0.21
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5 and Hy3 comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Hy3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.