Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 ranks higher (#17 vs #18); Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $5.00/$25.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #17 vs #18AskClash overall scores 59.9 vs 59.9.
Pricing $0.10/$0.50 vs $5.00/$25.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Anthropic.
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 59.9 | 59.9 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #17 | #18 |
| ACB | 63.5 | 60.1 |
| RWT | — | 9.0 |
| Coding Agent Index | — | 72.5 |
| HLE | 57.4 | 57.9 |
| GPQA | — | 93.6 |
| IFEval | — | 62.2 |
| SWE-bench | — | 88.6 |
| SWE-Pro | 64.8 | 69.2 |
| SWE-Atlas | — | 82.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 32.8 | 21.7 |
| DeepSWE | — | 59.0 |
| GDPval-AA | 1620.0 | 1889.8 |
| OSWorld | — | 83.4 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 82.2 |
| Finance Agent | 54.1 | 53.9 |
| CharXiv | — | 89.9 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | — | 72.1 |
| Tau2 | — | 94.4 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.10 | $5.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.50 | $25.0 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 16 |
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 head-to-head charts
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 4 and Claude Opus 4.8 leads 3 of 7 shared benchmarks. Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Opus 4.8
Overall
ACB
HLE
SWE-Pro
Terminal-Bench
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input$0.10
Output$0.50
Workload$0.20
Context1M
Claude Opus 4.8
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 comparisons
Explore how Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.