Which is better: Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 ranks higher (#16 vs #34) and wins 2 of 2 shared benchmarks; Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $2.50/$7.50 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 ranks higher (#16 vs #34) and wins 2 of 2 shared benchmarks; Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $2.50/$7.50 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Claude Haiku 5.5 model page Qwen3.7 Max model page

Rank #16 vs #34AskClash overall scores 60.0 vs 52.2.

Pricing $0.10/$0.50 vs $2.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Claude Haiku 5.5	Qwen3.7 Max
Overall Score	60.0	52.2
Leaderboard Rank	#16	#34
ACB	63.5	—
RWT	—	7.5
HLE	57.4	41.4
GPQA	—	92.4
IFEval	—	94.3
SWE-bench	—	80.4
SWE-Pro	64.8	—
Terminal-Bench	32.8	—
GDPval-AA	1620.0	1546.0
MCP Atlas	—	76.4
Finance Agent	—	48.4
Tau2	—	94.7
MRCR	—	90.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.10	$2.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.50	$7.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	8	8

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max head-to-head charts

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 3 and Qwen3.7 Max leads 0 of 3 shared benchmarks. Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.7 Max

Overall

60.0Claude Haiku 5.5

52.2Qwen3.7 Max

HLE

57.4Claude Haiku 5.5

41.4Qwen3.7 Max

GDPval-AA

1620.0Claude Haiku 5.5

1546.0Qwen3.7 Max

Claude Haiku 5.5

Input$0.10

Output$0.50

Workload$0.20

Context1M

Qwen3.7 Max

Input$2.50

Output$7.50

Workload$4.00

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max comparisons

Explore how Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.