Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 ranks higher (#16 vs #24) and wins 3 of 5 shared benchmarks.
Rank #16 vs #24AskClash overall scores 60.0 vs 57.6.
Pricing $0.10/$0.50 vs $0.16/$0.47Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Alibaba.
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 60.0 | 57.6 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #16 | #24 |
| ACB | 63.5 | 66.5 |
| HLE | 57.4 | 35.9 |
| GPQA | — | 91.7 |
| IFEval | — | 81.3 |
| SWE-Pro | 64.8 | 62.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 32.8 | 25.2 |
| DeepSWE | — | 58.7 |
| GDPval-AA | 1620.0 | 1743.0 |
| CharXiv | — | 90.6 |
| MMMU-Pro | — | 79.8 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.10 | $0.16 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.50 | $0.47 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 8 | 12 |
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next head-to-head charts
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 4 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 2 of 6 shared benchmarks. Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall
ACB
HLE
SWE-Pro
Terminal-Bench
GDPval-AA
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input$0.10
Output$0.50
Workload$0.20
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparisons
Explore how Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.