LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Opus 4.7 model pageClaude Sonnet 5 model page
Rank #5 vs #8AskClash overall scores 77.1 vs 75.3.
Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Anthropic.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Claude Sonnet 5
Overall Score77.175.3
Leaderboard Rank#5#8
RWT8.58.5
Coding Agent Index50.3—
HLE54.757.4
GPQA94.291.1
SWE-bench87.685.2
SWE-Pro64.363.2
Terminal-Bench69.480.4
DeepSWE—53.8
OSWorld78.081.2
MCP Atlas77.3—
Finance Agent64.4—
CharXiv91.088.3
MMMU-Pro75.277.3
ARC-AGI 275.8—
Tau288.6—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$25.0$15.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1412

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 5 head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 4.7 leads 5 and Claude Sonnet 5 leads 4 of 10 shared benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 4.7Claude Sonnet 5
Overall
77.1Claude Opus 4.7
75.3Claude Sonnet 5
RWT
8.5Claude Opus 4.7
8.5Claude Sonnet 5
HLE
54.7Claude Opus 4.7
57.4Claude Sonnet 5
GPQA
94.2Claude Opus 4.7
91.1Claude Sonnet 5
SWE-bench
87.6Claude Opus 4.7
85.2Claude Sonnet 5
SWE-Pro
64.3Claude Opus 4.7
63.2Claude Sonnet 5
Terminal-Bench
69.4Claude Opus 4.7
80.4Claude Sonnet 5
OSWorld
78.0Claude Opus 4.7
81.2Claude Sonnet 5
CharXiv
91.0Claude Opus 4.7
88.3Claude Sonnet 5
MMMU-Pro
75.2Claude Opus 4.7
77.3Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Opus 4.7
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Claude Sonnet 5
Input$3.00
Output$15.0
Workload$6.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 5 comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.