LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Opus 4.7 model pageGemini 3.1 Pro model page
Rank #5 vs #24AskClash overall scores 77.1 vs 52.3.
Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $2.00/$12.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Google.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 3.1 Pro
Overall Score77.152.3
Leaderboard Rank#5#24
RWT8.5—
Coding Agent Index50.330.3
HLE54.751.4
GPQA94.294.3
SWE-bench87.680.6
SWE-Pro64.354.2
Terminal-Bench69.468.5
DeepSWE—11.8
OSWorld78.0—
MCP Atlas77.369.2
Finance Agent64.443.0
CharXiv91.080.2
MMMU-Pro75.283.9
ARC-AGI 275.877.1
Tau288.699.3
MRCR—84.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$25.0$12.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1416

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 4.7 leads 9 and Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 4 of 13 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 4.7Gemini 3.1 Pro
Overall
77.1Claude Opus 4.7
52.3Gemini 3.1 Pro
Coding Agent Index
50.3Claude Opus 4.7
30.3Gemini 3.1 Pro
HLE
54.7Claude Opus 4.7
51.4Gemini 3.1 Pro
GPQA
94.2Claude Opus 4.7
94.3Gemini 3.1 Pro
SWE-bench
87.6Claude Opus 4.7
80.6Gemini 3.1 Pro
SWE-Pro
64.3Claude Opus 4.7
54.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench
69.4Claude Opus 4.7
68.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
MCP Atlas
77.3Claude Opus 4.7
69.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
Finance Agent
64.4Claude Opus 4.7
43.0Gemini 3.1 Pro
CharXiv
91.0Claude Opus 4.7
80.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
MMMU-Pro
75.2Claude Opus 4.7
83.9Gemini 3.1 Pro
ARC-AGI 2
75.8Claude Opus 4.7
77.1Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$12.0
Workload$4.40
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.