LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5 model pageGemini 3.1 Pro model page
Rank #1 vs #24AskClash overall scores 91.9 vs 51.9.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $2.00/$12.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Google.

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5Gemini 3.1 Pro
Overall Score91.951.9
Leaderboard Rank#1#24
RWT9.0—
Coding Agent Index77.242.7
HLE64.551.4
GPQA94.594.3
IFEval80.3—
SWE-bench95.580.6
SWE-Pro80.354.2
SWE-Atlas83.3—
Terminal-Bench88.068.5
DeepSWE69.711.8
OSWorld85.0—
MCP Atlas—69.2
Finance Agent56.343.0
CharXiv93.580.2
MMMU-Pro92.783.9
ARC-AGI 2—77.1
Tau289.299.3
MRCR—84.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$12.0
Context Window1M+1M
Benchmarks Published1616

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5 leads 11 and Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 1 of 12 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.1 Pro
Overall
91.9Claude Fable 5
51.9Gemini 3.1 Pro
Coding Agent Index
77.2Claude Fable 5
42.7Gemini 3.1 Pro
HLE
64.5Claude Fable 5
51.4Gemini 3.1 Pro
GPQA
94.5Claude Fable 5
94.3Gemini 3.1 Pro
SWE-bench
95.5Claude Fable 5
80.6Gemini 3.1 Pro
SWE-Pro
80.3Claude Fable 5
54.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench
88.0Claude Fable 5
68.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSWE
69.7Claude Fable 5
11.8Gemini 3.1 Pro
Finance Agent
56.3Claude Fable 5
43.0Gemini 3.1 Pro
CharXiv
93.5Claude Fable 5
80.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
MMMU-Pro
92.7Claude Fable 5
83.9Gemini 3.1 Pro
Tau2
89.2Claude Fable 5
99.3Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$12.0
Workload$4.40
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5Grok 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.