LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax-M3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax-M3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Opus 4.7 model pageMiniMax-M3 model page
Rank #5 vs #31AskClash overall scores 77.1 vs 47.6.
Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $0.30/$1.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs MiniMax.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax-M3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax-M3
Overall Score77.147.6
Leaderboard Rank#5#31
RWT8.58.5
Coding Agent Index50.3—
HLE54.737.1
GPQA94.292.9
IFEval—82.9
SWE-bench87.680.5
SWE-Pro64.359.0
Terminal-Bench69.466.0
OSWorld78.070.1
MCP Atlas77.374.2
Finance Agent64.448.3
CharXiv91.0—
MMMU-Pro75.278.1
ARC-AGI 275.8—
Tau288.688.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$25.0$1.20
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1414

Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax-M3 head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 4.7 leads 9 and MiniMax-M3 leads 2 of 12 shared benchmarks. MiniMax-M3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 4.7MiniMax-M3
Overall
77.1Claude Opus 4.7
47.6MiniMax-M3
RWT
8.5Claude Opus 4.7
8.5MiniMax-M3
HLE
54.7Claude Opus 4.7
37.1MiniMax-M3
GPQA
94.2Claude Opus 4.7
92.9MiniMax-M3
SWE-bench
87.6Claude Opus 4.7
80.5MiniMax-M3
SWE-Pro
64.3Claude Opus 4.7
59.0MiniMax-M3
Terminal-Bench
69.4Claude Opus 4.7
66.0MiniMax-M3
OSWorld
78.0Claude Opus 4.7
70.1MiniMax-M3
MCP Atlas
77.3Claude Opus 4.7
74.2MiniMax-M3
Finance Agent
64.4Claude Opus 4.7
48.3MiniMax-M3
MMMU-Pro
75.2Claude Opus 4.7
78.1MiniMax-M3
Tau2
88.6Claude Opus 4.7
88.9MiniMax-M3
Claude Opus 4.7
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
MiniMax-M3
Input$0.30
Output$1.20
Workload$0.54
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax-M3 comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax-M3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5 vs MiniMax-M3Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M3GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax-M3Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax-M3Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.