LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.1: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Opus 4.7 model pageMuse Spark 1.1 model page
Rank #5 vs #13AskClash overall scores 77.1 vs 68.1.
Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Meta.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.1 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Muse Spark 1.1
Overall Score77.168.1
Leaderboard Rank#5#13
RWT8.57.5
Coding Agent Index50.3—
HLE54.762.1
GPQA94.2—
SWE-bench87.6—
SWE-Pro64.361.5
Terminal-Bench69.480.0
OSWorld78.080.8
MCP Atlas77.388.1
Finance Agent64.457.2
CharXiv91.088.4
MMMU-Pro75.2—
ARC-AGI 275.8—
Tau288.6—
MRCR—54.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$25.0$4.25
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1410

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.1 head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 4.7 leads 5 and Muse Spark 1.1 leads 4 of 9 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 4.7Muse Spark 1.1
Overall
77.1Claude Opus 4.7
68.1Muse Spark 1.1
RWT
8.5Claude Opus 4.7
7.5Muse Spark 1.1
HLE
54.7Claude Opus 4.7
62.1Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-Pro
64.3Claude Opus 4.7
61.5Muse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench
69.4Claude Opus 4.7
80.0Muse Spark 1.1
OSWorld
78.0Claude Opus 4.7
80.8Muse Spark 1.1
MCP Atlas
77.3Claude Opus 4.7
88.1Muse Spark 1.1
Finance Agent
64.4Claude Opus 4.7
57.2Muse Spark 1.1
CharXiv
91.0Claude Opus 4.7
88.4Muse Spark 1.1
Claude Opus 4.7
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Muse Spark 1.1
Input$1.25
Output$4.25
Workload$2.10
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Spark 1.1 comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Spark 1.1 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.1

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.