Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5 ranks higher (#5 vs #30) and wins 8 of 9 shared benchmarks; Muse Spark 1.1 costs less ($1.25/$4.25 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #5 vs #30AskClash overall scores 74.2 vs 54.5.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Meta.
Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 74.2 | 54.5 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #5 | #30 |
| ACB | 64.6 | 51.3 |
| RWT | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Coding Agent Index | 77.2 | — |
| HLE | 64.5 | 62.1 |
| GPQA | 94.5 | — |
| IFEval | 80.3 | — |
| SWE-bench | 95.5 | — |
| SWE-Pro | 80.3 | 61.5 |
| SWE-Atlas | 83.3 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 42.4 | — |
| DeepSWE | 69.7 | 53.3 |
| GDPval-AA | 1932.5 | 1381.0 |
| OSWorld | 85.0 | 80.8 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 88.1 |
| Finance Agent | 56.3 | 57.2 |
| CharXiv | 93.5 | 88.4 |
| MMMU-Pro | 89.3 | — |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 89.2 | — |
| Tau2 | 89.2 | — |
| MRCR | — | 54.1 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $1.25 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $50.0 | $4.25 |
| Context Window | 1M+ | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 16 | 9 |
Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 head-to-head charts
Claude Fable 5 leads 9 and Muse Spark 1.1 leads 1 of 10 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Fable 5Muse Spark 1.1
Overall
ACB
RWT
HLE
SWE-Pro
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
OSWorld
Finance Agent
CharXiv
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
Muse Spark 1.1
Input$1.25
Output$4.25
Workload$2.10
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Fable 5 and Muse Spark 1.1 comparisons
Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Muse Spark 1.1 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.