LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 Max: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Opus 4.7 model pageQwen3.7 Max model page
Rank #5 vs #9AskClash overall scores 77.1 vs 71.2.
Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $2.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 Max benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Qwen3.7 Max
Overall Score77.171.2
Leaderboard Rank#5#9
RWT8.57.5
Coding Agent Index50.3—
HLE54.741.4
GPQA94.292.4
IFEval—94.3
SWE-bench87.680.4
SWE-Pro64.3—
Terminal-Bench69.469.7
OSWorld78.0—
MCP Atlas77.376.4
Finance Agent64.448.4
CharXiv91.0—
MMMU-Pro75.2—
ARC-AGI 275.8—
Tau288.694.7
MRCR—90.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$2.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$25.0$7.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1411

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 Max head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 4.7 leads 7 and Qwen3.7 Max leads 2 of 9 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 4.7Qwen3.7 Max
Overall
77.1Claude Opus 4.7
71.2Qwen3.7 Max
RWT
8.5Claude Opus 4.7
7.5Qwen3.7 Max
HLE
54.7Claude Opus 4.7
41.4Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA
94.2Claude Opus 4.7
92.4Qwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench
87.6Claude Opus 4.7
80.4Qwen3.7 Max
Terminal-Bench
69.4Claude Opus 4.7
69.7Qwen3.7 Max
MCP Atlas
77.3Claude Opus 4.7
76.4Qwen3.7 Max
Finance Agent
64.4Claude Opus 4.7
48.4Qwen3.7 Max
Tau2
88.6Claude Opus 4.7
94.7Qwen3.7 Max
Claude Opus 4.7
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Qwen3.7 Max
Input$2.50
Output$7.50
Workload$4.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.7 Max comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.7 Max stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxGPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Max

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.