ACB
76.5 score
LLM Leaderboard · Proprietary
Claude Opus 5.5 benchmarks — leaderboard rank, pricing, and comparisons.
Claude Opus 5.5 ranks #1 on the AskClash LLM leaderboard with an overall score of 80.0. It scores 59.6 on Terminal-Bench. Compare Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, open-weight, and frontier AI models using public benchmark scores, token pricing, context window, and access details.
Rank #1AskClash overall score: 80.0
$4.00 / $20.0Input and output token price, when published. Context: 1M.
Visit websiteVisit the model provider's website.
Claude Opus 5.5 benchmark snapshot
AskClash combines public LLM benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.
Overall80.0
Benchmark cells12
Context1M
CreatorAnthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 public benchmark scores
Cached benchmark values can include HLE, GPQA, SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, ARC-AGI-2, Tau2, and model-specific coding or agent scores.
HLE
67.7 score
SWE-Pro
89.9 score
Terminal-Bench
59.6 score
DeepSWE
74.2 score
GDPval-AA
1846.2 score
Finance Agent
58.6 score
MMMU-Pro
87.7 score
ARC-AGI 2
91.7 score
Claude Opus 5.5 vs other AI models
Use these comparison links to evaluate Claude Opus 5.5 against nearby LLMs by benchmark score, price, context window, and provider.
Related AI and tech coverage
Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, benchmark, pricing, or market context around this model.
Anthropic tests its next model under Claude Opus 5.5
Testing Catalog
Gemini 4 Argon is now available worldwide as Google's most capable frontier model
Google is making Gemini 4 Argon available worldwide through its API, the Gemini app, and Google Antigravity. The frontier model is aggressively priced but trails Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 and Meta's Muse Wonder Full in independent benchmarks. Internally, Goo
Meta claims new Muse Wonder AI models rival OpenAI, Anthropic
Meta’s new models are its most expensive to date, with the standard Wonder model charging $4 per million input tokens, matching Claude Opus 5.5 but undercutting GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1, which charge $10 and $50 respectively. Bindu Reddy, CEO of Abacus
AI agent teams waste massive tokens for barely measurable quality gains, research finds
Teams of AI agents barely outperform solo agents but cost up to 5.1x more, according to Vals AI. Only one out of four tests with GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 showed a measurable gain. Anthropic's own data backs this up: beyond ten agents, quality plateaus whi
Last cached leaderboard date: . This model page is generated from the AskClash LLM Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.