LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher (#1 vs #4); Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 4 of 6 shared benchmarks; Kimi K3.1 Pro costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens).

Rank #1 vs #4AskClash overall scores 78.6 vs 75.5.
Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $2.00/$10.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Moonshot AI.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
Overall Score78.675.5
Leaderboard Rank#1#4
ACB76.5—
HLE67.770.0
GPQA—94.2
SWE-Pro89.9—
Terminal-Bench59.665.7
DeepSWE74.275.5
GDPval-AA1846.21846.0
Finance Agent58.658.6
CharXiv—89.0
MMMU-Pro87.784.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$4.00$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$20.0$10.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published119

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 5.5 leads 3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro leads 4 of 7 shared benchmarks. Kimi K3.1 Pro is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
Overall
78.6Claude Opus 5.5
75.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
HLE
67.7Claude Opus 5.5
70.0Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench
59.6Claude Opus 5.5
65.7Kimi K3.1 Pro
DeepSWE
74.2Claude Opus 5.5
75.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
GDPval-AA
1846.2Claude Opus 5.5
1846.0Kimi K3.1 Pro
Finance Agent
58.6Claude Opus 5.5
58.6Kimi K3.1 Pro
MMMU-Pro
87.7Claude Opus 5.5
84.1Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Opus 5.5
Input$4.00
Output$20.0
Workload$8.00
Context1M
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 5.5 and Kimi K3.1 Pro comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 5.5 and Kimi K3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.