How do Claude Opus 5 and Inkling-Small compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Claude Opus 5 and Inkling-Small when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Inkling-Small: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Claude Opus 5 or Inkling-Small?

AskClash compares Claude Opus 5 and Inkling-Small side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 5 vs Inkling-Small comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Claude Opus 5 model page Inkling-Small model page

Rank #1 vs #18AskClash overall scores 95.4 vs 58.2.

Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $0.58/$1.44Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Thinking Machines Lab.

Claude Opus 5 vs Inkling-Small benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Claude Opus 5	Inkling-Small
Overall Score	95.4	58.2
Leaderboard Rank	#1	#18
RWT	9.0	—
Coding Agent Index	78.0	—
HLE	64.7	47.8
GPQA	93.2	89.5
IFEval	—	82.2
SWE-bench	96.0	80.2
SWE-Pro	79.2	—
Terminal-Bench	89.1	64.7
DeepSWE	73.6	—
MCP Atlas	85.8	79.6
CharXiv	—	81.3
MMMU-Pro	84.7	74.0
ARC-AGI 2	90.4	40.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$5.00	$0.58
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$25.0	$1.44
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	13	9

Claude Opus 5 vs Inkling-Small head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 5 leads 8 and Inkling-Small leads 0 of 8 shared benchmarks. Inkling-Small is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 5Inkling-Small

Overall

95.4Claude Opus 5

58.2Inkling-Small

HLE

64.7Claude Opus 5

47.8Inkling-Small

GPQA

93.2Claude Opus 5

89.5Inkling-Small

SWE-bench

96.0Claude Opus 5

80.2Inkling-Small

Terminal-Bench

89.1Claude Opus 5

64.7Inkling-Small

MCP Atlas

85.8Claude Opus 5

79.6Inkling-Small

MMMU-Pro

84.7Claude Opus 5

74.0Inkling-Small

ARC-AGI 2

90.4Claude Opus 5

40.1Inkling-Small

Claude Opus 5

Input$5.00

Output$25.0

Workload$10

Context1M

Inkling-Small

Input$0.58

Output$1.44

Workload$0.87

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 5 and Inkling-Small comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 5 and Inkling-Small stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 vs Inkling-Small Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol vs Inkling-Small Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Inkling-Small Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 vs Inkling-Small Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 Kimi K3 vs Inkling-Small

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.