How do Claude Fable 5 and Inkling-Small compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Claude Fable 5 and Inkling-Small when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Inkling-Small: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Claude Fable 5 or Inkling-Small?

AskClash compares Claude Fable 5 and Inkling-Small side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Inkling-Small comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Claude Fable 5 model page Inkling-Small model page

Rank #2 vs #18AskClash overall scores 92.3 vs 58.2.

Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.58/$1.44Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Thinking Machines Lab.

Claude Fable 5 vs Inkling-Small benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Claude Fable 5	Inkling-Small
Overall Score	92.3	58.2
Leaderboard Rank	#2	#18
RWT	9.0	—
Coding Agent Index	77.2	—
HLE	64.5	47.8
GPQA	94.5	89.5
IFEval	80.3	82.2
SWE-bench	95.5	80.2
SWE-Pro	80.3	—
SWE-Atlas	83.3	—
Terminal-Bench	88.0	64.7
DeepSWE	69.7	—
OSWorld	85.0	—
MCP Atlas	—	79.6
Finance Agent	56.3	—
CharXiv	93.5	81.3
MMMU-Pro	92.7	74.0
ARC-AGI 2	—	40.1
Tau2	89.2	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$10.0	$0.58
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$50.0	$1.44
Context Window	1M+	1M
Benchmarks Published	17	9

Claude Fable 5 vs Inkling-Small head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5 leads 7 and Inkling-Small leads 1 of 8 shared benchmarks. Inkling-Small is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5Inkling-Small

Overall

92.3Claude Fable 5

58.2Inkling-Small

HLE

64.5Claude Fable 5

47.8Inkling-Small

GPQA

94.5Claude Fable 5

89.5Inkling-Small

IFEval

80.3Claude Fable 5

82.2Inkling-Small

SWE-bench

95.5Claude Fable 5

80.2Inkling-Small

Terminal-Bench

88.0Claude Fable 5

64.7Inkling-Small

CharXiv

93.5Claude Fable 5

81.3Inkling-Small

MMMU-Pro

92.7Claude Fable 5

74.0Inkling-Small

Claude Fable 5

Input$10.0

Output$50.0

Workload$20

Context1M+

Inkling-Small

Input$0.58

Output$1.44

Workload$0.87

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5 and Inkling-Small comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Inkling-Small stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 5 vs Inkling-Small Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol vs Inkling-Small Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Inkling-Small Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 vs Inkling-Small Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3 Kimi K3 vs Inkling-Small

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.