Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ranks higher (#3 vs #49) and wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.7 Plus costs less ($0.40/$1.60 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #3 vs #49AskClash overall scores 77.7 vs 29.6.
Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 77.7 | 29.6 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #3 | #49 |
| ACB | 76.6 | — |
| AA Intelligence Index | 56.0 | 25.8 |
| AutomationBench-AA | 71.8 | — |
| RWT | — | 7.5 |
| Coding Agent Index | 59.3 | — |
| HLE | 64.5 | 34.7 |
| GPQA | 95.6 | 90.3 |
| IFEval | — | 94.6 |
| SWE-bench | — | 77.7 |
| SWE-Pro | 81.3 | 57.6 |
| SWE-Atlas | 64.2 | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 63.6 | — |
| DeepSWE | 71.0 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1837.8 | 1522.1 |
| OSWorld | — | 73.3 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 73.2 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 | 67.3 | — |
| CharXiv | — | 85.9 |
| MMMU-Pro | — | 79.0 |
| Tau2 | — | 93.0 |
| MRCR | — | 91.7 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.40 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $1.60 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 13 | 8 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 5 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 0 of 5 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Claude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall
AA Intelligence Index
HLE
GPQA
SWE-Pro
GDPval-AA
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1M
Qwen3.7 Plus
Input$0.40
Output$1.60
Workload$0.72
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons
Explore how Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 CarbonGemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.7 PlusClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.7 Plus
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.