Which is better: Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Verdict: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ranks higher (#6 vs #46) and wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.7 Plus costs less ($0.40/$1.60 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ranks higher (#6 vs #46) and wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.7 Plus costs less ($0.40/$1.60 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Claude Sonnet 5.5 model page Qwen3.7 Plus model page

Rank #6 vs #46AskClash overall scores 73.7 vs 42.5.

Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $0.40/$1.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Claude Sonnet 5.5	Qwen3.7 Plus
Overall Score	73.7	42.5
Leaderboard Rank	#6	#46
ACB	76.6	—
RWT	—	7.5
HLE	64.5	34.7
GPQA	—	90.3
IFEval	—	94.6
SWE-bench	—	77.7
SWE-Pro	81.3	57.6
Terminal-Bench	83.2	70.3
DeepSWE	71.0	—
GDPval-AA	1844.2	1522.1
OSWorld	—	73.3
MCP Atlas	—	73.2
Finance Agent	58.1	38.2
CharXiv	—	85.9
MMMU-Pro	—	79.0
Tau2	—	93.0
MRCR	—	91.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$0.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$10.0	$1.60
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	12

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus head-to-head charts

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 6 and Qwen3.7 Plus leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3.7 Plus

Overall

73.7Claude Sonnet 5.5

42.5Qwen3.7 Plus

HLE

64.5Claude Sonnet 5.5

34.7Qwen3.7 Plus

SWE-Pro

81.3Claude Sonnet 5.5

57.6Qwen3.7 Plus

Terminal-Bench

83.2Claude Sonnet 5.5

70.3Qwen3.7 Plus

GDPval-AA

1844.2Claude Sonnet 5.5

1522.1Qwen3.7 Plus

Finance Agent

58.1Claude Sonnet 5.5

38.2Qwen3.7 Plus

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Input$2.00

Output$10.0

Workload$4.00

Context1M

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input$0.40

Output$1.60

Workload$0.72

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus comparisons

Explore how Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.