LLM Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#27 vs #53) and wins 7 of 7 shared benchmarks; Kimi K2.7 costs less ($0.95/$4.00 vs $3.00/$15.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardClaude Sonnet 5 model pageKimi K2.7 model page
Rank #27 vs #53AskClash overall scores 59.2 vs 38.0.
Pricing $3.00/$15.0 vs $0.95/$4.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Moonshot AI.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5Kimi K2.7
Overall Score59.238.0
Leaderboard Rank#27#53
ACB60.843.0
RWT8.57.5
HLE57.435.0
GPQA91.189.6
IFEval—63.1
SWE-bench85.2—
SWE-Pro63.2—
Terminal-Bench80.444.7
DeepSWE53.830.5
GDPval-AA1618.01040.5
OSWorld81.2—
MCP Atlas—76.0
CharXiv88.3—
MMMU-Pro77.3—
Tau2—90.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$3.00$0.95
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$15.0$4.00
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published1210

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2.7 head-to-head charts

Claude Sonnet 5 leads 8 and Kimi K2.7 leads 0 of 8 shared benchmarks. Kimi K2.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Sonnet 5Kimi K2.7
Overall
59.2Claude Sonnet 5
38.0Kimi K2.7
ACB
60.8Claude Sonnet 5
43.0Kimi K2.7
RWT
8.5Claude Sonnet 5
7.5Kimi K2.7
HLE
57.4Claude Sonnet 5
35.0Kimi K2.7
GPQA
91.1Claude Sonnet 5
89.6Kimi K2.7
Terminal-Bench
80.4Claude Sonnet 5
44.7Kimi K2.7
DeepSWE
53.8Claude Sonnet 5
30.5Kimi K2.7
GDPval-AA
1618.0Claude Sonnet 5
1040.5Kimi K2.7
Claude Sonnet 5
Input$3.00
Output$15.0
Workload$6.00
Context1M
Kimi K2.7
Input$0.95
Output$4.00
Workload$1.75
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Sonnet 5 and Kimi K2.7 comparisons

Explore how Claude Sonnet 5 and Kimi K2.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K2.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.