LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher (#23 vs #65) and wins 3 of 4 shared benchmarks; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.60 vs $0.30/$2.50 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardDeepSeek V4.1 Flash model pageGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model page
Rank #23 vs #65AskClash overall scores 58.4 vs 34.8.
Pricing $0.15/$0.60 vs $0.30/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Google.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall Score58.434.8
Leaderboard Rank#23#65
ACB63.0—
RWT—7.0
HLE36.818.8
GPQA90.983.8
SWE-Pro—54.2
Terminal-Bench26.8—
DeepSWE74.2—
GDPval-AA1600.01140.0
OSWorld—74.0
Finance Agent—47.4
MMMU-Pro77.079.0
MRCR—72.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.60$2.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published109

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 1 of 5 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall
58.4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
34.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
HLE
36.8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
18.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
GPQA
90.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
83.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
GDPval-AA
1600.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
1140.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
MMMU-Pro
77.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
79.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input$0.30
Output$2.50
Workload$0.80
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.